New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10204 previous messages)
almarst2003
- 12:09pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (#
10205 of 10215)
People in Baghdad prepare for war while members of the
"coalition of the willing" show their colours, writes Brian
Whitaker
Wednesday March 19, 2003
Tony Blair need not go into exile just yet. Last night his
government won formal backing for war with Iraq when
parliament voted 2-1 in favour. This was despite the biggest
ever revolt by MPs. Among the ruling Labour party, 139 members
rebelled, and 16 Conservatives, 53 Liberal Democrats and 11
others joined them. But because of Mr Blair's massive built-in
majority, it was still well short of the total that might have
forced regime change in Britain.
In other developments overnight, the Turkish government
said it will try again to get permission from parliament for
US warplanes to fly over its territory, and the White House
suddenly changed the terms of its ultimatum to Saddam Hussein.
The Iraqi leader had earlier been given 48 hours to avert
war by fleeing Iraq along with his two appalling sons, but
last night White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said US
forces would invade "no matter what". The excuse, apparently,
is that they need to hunt for weapons of mass destruction.
The official UN weapons inspectors, meanwhile, have all
been evacuated from Iraq - several of them complaining about
the curtailment of their work and the aspersions that have
been cast on their professional abilities. What chance they'll
sue President Bush for constructive dismissal?
Colin Powell claimed last night that 45 countries have now
joined the "coalition of the willing" against Iraq. They
include such key players as Afghanistan, Latvia, Lithuania,
Nicaragua and Uzbekistan, but 15 of them have asked not to be
named until they see which way the war is going.
In some cases, calling these countries supporters of the
war would be extremely generous with the truth - a bit like
describing concrete posts that hold up a football stadium as
"supporters" of Manchester United. Spain, whose smiling
little prime minister managed to get his photo taken next to
George Bush and Mr Blair at the weekend, has confirmed that it
won't actually be sending any troops.
Talking of support, an opinion poll this morning by the
Washington-based Pew Research Center finds rapidly declining
enthusiasm for the United States in Europe. In Italy, only
34% view the US favourably, compared with 70% in 2002. The
current figure for Britain is 48%, Spain 14%, France 31% and
Germany 25%.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,917444,00.html
almarst2003
- 12:38pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (#
10206 of 10215)
VOTE NO ON WAR http://www.votenowar.org/
UNITED EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN: This Week
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19: No Business as Usual! No War on Iraq!
NATIONAL CALL TO ACTION
Tuesday, March 18: Emergency Convergence in New York City
in Union Square at 5 pm
George W. Bush has promised to unleash an all-out war
against Iraq, possibly as soon as Wednesday, March 19. We join
with peace-loving people all over the world in challenging
this 48 hour war ultimatum. At this critical moment, we urge
all people of conscience to oppose this illegal war of
aggression by participating in the following actions:
1) Tuesday, March 18, 5 p.m. Emergency New York City
convergence at Union Square
2) Wednesday, March 19: Walkout! No Business as Usual!
Converge and demonstrate on the day of the Bush ultimatum.
New York City, March 19: Converge at 12 noon at Union
Square. March and converge at Times Square at 5 p.m.
Washington DC, March 19: Converge at 12 noon on the north
side of the White House and stay there all day until a march
at 5 p.m.
San Francisco, March 19: Gather at 5 p.m. at Powell and
Market
and at central locations in cities and towns around the
country
3) Saturday, March 22: New York City march, 11:30 a.m.
Assemble at Broadway, between 41st and 36th St.
If war has begun, there will also be a March 22 regional
demo at the White House in Washington DC at 12 noon, San
Francisco, Los Angeles and in other cities around the country.
If war is launched, no business as usual that day. Converge
at 12 noon and into the night.
rshow55
- 12:54pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (#
10207 of 10215)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Iraq's ultimate option Surrender to the United
Nations Leader Wednesday March 19, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,917276,00.html
Iraq must surrender. It really has no other
viable choice. The Baghdad regime should agree to relinquish
power and place the country under the protection of the UN
security council. Saddam Hussein, his sons and chief cronies
should accept the American offer of safe conduct and go into
exile while they still can. Iraq might then be peacefully
occupied by military forces operating under UN auspices and
with a fresh UN mandate. If Iraq's dictator does not
immediately follow this course of action, it is certain that
President George Bush will not rest until he has been
forcibly removed from power and in all probability killed.
For the greater good, but also for his own wretched
survival, Saddam must give it up. Surrender is now the only
way to avoid a devastating, imminent onslaught that may
claim thousands of lives and will have but one ultimate
outcome.
- - -
European press review Sandra Smith and Sam Jones
Wednesday March 19, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,917038,00.html
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|