New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10158 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:56am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10159 of 10161) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I've been in a sort of Cassandra position - after a very careful extensive education - much of it supervised, I've said, by Bill Casey.

Casey, if one thinks in graduate school terms - might be thought of as "the thesis advisor from Hell."

Much of my study involved issues of combat - also the theory and practice of deception, where I made important contributions that have been extensively used - and psychological warfare in all aspects and at all levels.

After some difficulties described on this thread with some consistency over some time - I did as I had promised to do and attempted to "come in through The New York Times" - which I have done in a sense - not yet done in some other senses. Naturally, since my specializations have included psychological warfare, some of my postings have involved a theological twist.

Details and the Golden Rule http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/DetailNGR.htm

9438-39 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.IdMzaU6R6tz.2519910@.f28e622/10977

The golden rule is discussed from a perspective concerned about both God and man in God is the Projection of Mans Unrealised Potential - Discuss 9438-39 quotes passages that connect to issues of (technical and moral) right and wrong - and connect closely to war and peace.

rshow55 - 08:57am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10160 of 10161) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Right now, it seems to me that things could go terribly - but they could also go very well, in many humanly important senses, if people try to do the best they can - in ways they can feel proud about, and can explain.

I'm often afraid that I'm backwards - and just now - I'm very uneasy because it seems to me that if people work at it, a lot of things that need sorting out may sort out well.

One thing's clear. Patterns are sharpening. That's often a very (good-bad) sign.

If this is "N - dimensional chess" some patterns are condensing. (Search Wizard's Chess)

I think it is possible that the Bush administration, wrong as it clearly is from some important perspectives, may be doing some other things very right from others. Contradiction can be a necessary stage in sorting things out - and a contradiction condensed and clarified can be a hopeful call to action. 9332-34 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.IdMzaU6R6tz.2519910@.f28e622/10866

At much lower priority, some significant deletions are noted in 9304 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.IdMzaU6R6tz.2519910@.f28e622/10838 and there are many links mentioning Senator Carl Levin, who I saw and admired on television last night, in 9338-39 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.IdMzaU6R6tz.2519910@.f28e622/10872

Knife or sword fights are classic combat circumstances - and some basics haven't changed since Achilles' time. A few degrees of elbow rotation can make the difference between living and dying. Details matter. It is a good time for people to be careful - or at least as careful as they know how to be.

rshow55 - 09:00am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10161 of 10161) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

. . . ! . .

The stock market went up yesterday, and I think it was right to do so - if some of the shrinking violets associated with the securities business get on the phone, using connections they have and know how to use - and see to it that some facts get checked.

If people are too sloppy, the stock market market made the wrong move.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.

Message:






Home | Forums FAQ | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us