New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10151 previous messages)

gisterme - 01:48am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10152 of 10161)

lchic - 12:54am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10142 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.IdMzaU6R6tz.2519716@.f28e622/11686

"An important point that came through media coverage on Iraq relates to the people of Iraq feeling and knowing that they WILL be in charge of their own future --- ..."

Of course they will, lchic. Has this concept just occured to you? Nobody honest has ever said, suggested or implied that anybody but the Iraqi people should be in charge of their future after Saddam's gone. Those who have tried to imply otherwise as part of their propaganda are those who will say whatever is necessary to advance their own agendas. That's just the kind of stuff that almarst laps up like a cat on cream because it fits her agenda.

lchic - 01:50am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10153 of 10161)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Statues ... 'He's a Yesterday Man'

Interesting that Status might represent either 'Libery' or 'Repression'

... nevertheless in the post-war era they can be coralled into money-spinning tourist theme parks ...

History - culture

Culture - History

Dollars - Dollars

lchic - 02:02am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10154 of 10161)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

In charge of their future - -- - just recalling impressions from media coverage ... which suggested that until the post-war withdrawal of assisting miltary the Iraqi's might not 'feel' themselves to be 'in charge' of their own futures.

Didn't Robert Fisk previously note the 'MOUSE' factor ... especially when the mice were dominated by local tyranical rats.

______

There are great Islamic art collections that must gender a sense of pride, culture, and history for the Middle East.

http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/department.asp?dep=14

http://www.islamicart.com/

http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/islamic/artofobject1a.htm

lchic - 05:20am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10155 of 10161)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

More than half the Iraqi population are minors

The noise of bombs and bombing - will it traumatise?

rshow55 - 08:47am Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10156 of 10161) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

They will. A lot of people will have "fractured minds" - and will have to sort a lot out. That can be healthy - or terrible.

There's going to be a lot of craziness - at a lot of human and organizational levels - under the best of circumstances.

Even though the best of circumstances could be, on balance, pretty good.

Under easily imaginable circumstances - much worse.

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Forums FAQ | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us