New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10115 previous messages)
lchic
- 08:41am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10116 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
......
"" The American people have thus been deliberately lied to,
their interests cynically misrepresented and misreported, the
real aims and intentions of this private war of Bush the son
and his junta concealed with complete arrogance. Never mind
that Wolfowitz, Feith, and Perle, all of them unelected
officials who work for unelected Donald Rumsfeld at the
Pentagon, have for some time openly advocated Israeli
annexation of the West Bank and Gaza and the cessation of the
Oslo process, have called for war against Iraq (and later
Iran), and the building of more illegal Israeli settlements in
their capacity (during Netanyahu's successful campaign for
prime minister in 1996) as private consultants to him, and
that that has become US policy now.
Never mind that Israel's iniquitous policies against
Palestinians, which are reported only at the ends of articles
(when they are reported at all) as so many miscellaneous
civilian deaths, are never compared with Saddam's crimes,
which they match or in some cases exceed, all of them, in the
final analysis, paid for by the US taxpayer without
consultation or approval. Over 40,000 Palestinians have been
wounded seriously in the last two years, and about 2,500
killed wantonly by Israeli soldiers who are instructed to
humiliate and punish an entire people during what has become
the longest military occupation in modern history.
Never mind that not a single critical Arab or Muslim voice
has been seen or heard on the major American media, liberal,
moderate, or reactionary, with any regularity at all since the
preparations for war have gone into their final phase.
Consider also that none of the major planners of this war,
certainly not the so-called experts like Bernard Lewis and
Fouad Ajami, neither of whom has so much as lived in or come
near the Arab world in decades, nor the military and political
people like Powell, Rice, Cheney, or the great god Bush
himself, know anything about the Muslim or Arab worlds beyond
what they see through Israeli or oil company or military
lenses, and therefore have no idea what a war of this
magnitude against Iraq will produce for the people actually
living there.
And consider too the sheer, unadorned hubris of men like
Wolfowitz and his assistants. Asked to testify to a largely
somnolent Congress about the war's consequences and costs they
are allowed to escape without giving any concrete answers,
which effectively dismisses the evidence of the army chief of
staff who has spoken of a military occupation force of 400,000
troops for 10 years at a cost of almost a trillion dollars.
Democracy traduced and betrayed, democracy celebrated but
in fact humiliated and trampled on by a tiny group of men who
have simply taken charge of this republic as if it were
nothing more than, what, an Arab country? It is right to ask
who is in charge since clearly the people of the United States
are not properly represented by the war this administration is
about to loose on a world already beleaguered by too much
misery and poverty to endure more. And Americans have been
badly served by a media controlled essentially by a tiny group
of men who edit out anything that might cause the government
the slightest concern or worry. As for the demagogues and
servile intellectuals who talk about war from the privacy of
their fantasy worlds, who gave them the right to connive in
the immiseration of millions of people whose major crime seems
to be that they are Muslims and Arabs? What American, except
for this small unrepresentative group, is seriously interested
in increasing the world's already ample stores of
anti-Americanism? Hardly any I would suppose.
Jonathan Swift, thou shouldst be living at this hour. http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/628/op2.htm
lchic
- 08:44am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10117 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Note
""And consider too the sheer, unadorned hubris of men like
Wolfowitz and his assistants. Asked to testify to a largely
somnolent Congress about the war's consequences and costs they
are allowed to escape without giving any concrete answers ...
lchic
- 08:54am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10118 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Future looks bleak for Iraq's fragile environment
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993491
To date, no government or UN agency has assessed the
environmental damage that might arise. This is odd, says Ian
Willmore of Friends of the Earth. "Both the US and British
governments argue that they have balanced the risks of
invasion against those of not invading. The environment has to
be part of that."
Environmental scientists and non-governmental organisations
are also fighting shy of forecasts, but few doubt the impact
will be dramatic. "The Gulf war showed that such conflicts
have devastating effects on the environment, biodiversity and
quality of life, long after the cessation of hostilities,"
says Michael Rands, chief executive of Cambridge-based
conservation alliance BirdLife International.
Acid rain
In 1991, Saddam's retreating forces sabotaged more than 600
Kuwaiti oil wells, which burned for up to nine months. The
fumes acidified rain and Kuwait City experienced darkness at
noon.
Oil also spilled into the Gulf, creating the largest ever
marine slick. It didn't wipe out marine life as some had
predicted - partly thanks to $700 million spent on mopping it
up and partly because the warm waters of the Gulf sped up the
oil's natural breakdown. Even so, local prawn fisheries were
damaged for years.
Probably the worst problem was one nobody foresaw. Some 60
million barrels of oil poured into the deserts of Kuwait and
formed oil lakes covering 49 square kilometres. From there,
the oil slowly percolated down into aquifers and has now
poisoned 40 per cent of the underground water - in a country
with less water per head than any other.
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|