New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10111 previous messages)
lchic
- 08:25am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10112 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Edward ... he said, he didn't think this war had been fully
thought through -- noted that cultural aspects were little
understood by the Bush camp.
lchic
- 08:28am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10113 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
SAID writes for
lchic
- 08:35am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10114 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Edward SAID "" The Bush administration's relentless
unilateral march towards war is profoundly disturbing for many
reasons, but so far as American citizens are concerned the
whole grotesque show is a tremendous failure in democracy. An
immensely wealthy and powerful republic has been hijacked by a
small cabal of individuals, all of them unelected and
therefore unresponsive to public pressure, and simply turned
on its head. It is no exaggeration to say that this war is the
most unpopular in modern history. Before the war has begun
there have been more people protesting it in this country
alone than was the case at the height of the anti- Vietnam war
demonstrations during the 60s and 70s. Note also that those
rallies took place after the war had been going on for several
years: this one has yet to begin, even though a large number
of overtly aggressive and belligerent steps have already been
taken by the US and its loyal puppy, the UK government of the
increasingly ridiculous Tony Blair. ....
lchic
- 08:39am Mar 17, 2003 EST (#
10115 of 10119) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
.....
"" In all my encounters and travels I have yet to meet a
person who is for the war. Even worse, most Americans now feel
that this mobilisation has already gone too far to stop, and
that we are on the verge of a disaster for the country.
Consider first of all that the Democratic Party, with few
exceptions, has simply gone over to the president's side in a
gutless display of false patriotism. Wherever you look in the
Congress there are the tell-tale signs either of the Zionist
lobby, the right-wing Christians, or the military-industrial
complex, three inordinately influential minority groups who
share hostility to the Arab world, unbridled support for
extremist Zionism, and an insensate conviction that they are
on the side of the angels. Every one of the 500 congressional
districts in this country has a defence industry in it, so
that war has been turned into a matter of jobs, not of
security. But, one might well ask, how does running an
unbelievably expensive war remedy, for instance, economic
recession, the almost certain bankruptcy of the social
security system, a mounting national debt, and a massive
failure in public education? Demonstrations are looked at
simply as a kind of degraded mob action, while the most
hypocritical lies pass for absolute truth, without criticism
and without objection.
The media has simply become a branch of the war effort.
What has entirely disappeared from television is anything
remotely resembling a consistently dissenting voice. Every
major channel now employs retired generals, former CIA agents,
terrorism experts and known neoconservatives as "consultants"
who speak a revolting jargon designed to sound authoritative
but in effect supporting everything done by the US, from the
UN to the sands of Arabia. Only one major daily newspaper (in
Baltimore) has published anything about US eavesdropping,
telephone tapping and message interception of the six small
countries that are members of the Security Council and whose
votes are undecided. There are no antiwar voices to read or
hear in any of the major medias of this country, no Arabs or
Muslims (who have been consigned en masse to the ranks of the
fanatics and terrorists of this world), no critics of Israel,
not on Public Broadcasting, not in The New York Times, the New
Yorker, US News and World Report, CNN and the rest. When these
organisations mention Iraq's flouting of 17 UN resolutions as
a pretext for war, the 64 resolutions flouted by Israel (with
US support) are never mentioned. Nor is the enormous human
suffering of the Iraqi people during the past 12 years
mentioned. Whatever the dreaded Saddam has done Israel and
Sharon have also done with American support, yet no one says
anything about the latter while fulminating about the former.
This makes a total mockery of taunts by Bush and others that
the UN should abide by its own resolutions.
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|