New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10081 previous messages)

gisterme - 05:35pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10082 of 10104)

rshow55 - 02:25pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10072 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.15gDaYzQ5YO.2273277@40679d@.f28e622/11617

"...A solid UN that works is needed..."

"Works" being the keyword there. That's absolutely right. Otherwise, something else needs to be done.

"...The phrase that the UN must mean what it says expresses an important ideal..."

By Jove, I think you finally "get it", Robert! Whew! Getting you to understand that was harder than being dragged through a knothole.

"...Sometimes, once the point of decision has really arrived - people stop bluffing and jiving and settle for things in their interest - and mutual interest..."

Let's hope that's true for the sake of the UN as a "workable" organization.

lchic - 06:45pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10083 of 10104)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Why didn't the three musketters .. whoops is that a forbidden french term ... whey didn't 'they' invite the Prime Minister of Baghdad-Iraq out to the Azores .... discussion would have been more purposeful ... and there would have been something/Iraq to talk about!

lchic - 06:48pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10084 of 10104)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Johnno didn't make the party

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/cartoon/

lchic - 06:53pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10085 of 10104)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Fire power used to be 'the power'

Then there was intelligent usages of information

    Took a LONG LONG time ... and they're still working on it for folks to appreciate the need to cleanly wash hands
Then there's the intelligent use of information - as in truth - the message about AIDS took a long time to get out of the mouths of many politicians ... take SouthAf for example.

What about the epidemolgical need for information flows today?

"" cases of what the World Health Organization now calls "severe acute respiratory syndrome" continued to rise through the weekend and spread

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/16/international/16SHELL-INFE.html

lchic - 07:02pm Mar 16, 2003 EST (# 10086 of 10104)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

0011 - SARS - precautions to stop spread

One jumbo of passengers going into Germany have been quarentined already

Raises the question of the quality of air, and precautions, within airplane cabins

    Didn't we hear that most airplanes recirculate 'the same air' ... for reasons of cost - not health
If there's a virus that could decimate the world population, and can't be stopped by regular anti-biotics

Then shouldn't the BEST airlines be setting a standard by both issuing face masks to travellers, and, improving and upgrading the quality of cabin air

There's a cost --- yet --- there's a possibility that airlines will be 'held to account' if they don't do their very best to LIMIT death

So who's speaking out?

Where's truth?

Not heard anything sensible so far !

_______

If this virus was tied to the death in the overcroweded LA prison system recently ... then ... shouldn't there be a SERIOUS attempt by the US to put back into the community many prisoners who've they've held for years, and who, should by now, be 'reformed for re-entry' ....

In http://www.epidem.com/ this sense --- do prisons do more harm than good?

More Messages Recent Messages (18 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Forums FAQ | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us