Forums

toolbar



 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?


Earliest MessagesPrevious MessagesRecent MessagesOutline (9221 previous messages)

lunarchick - 06:48pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9222 of 9229)
lunarchick@www.com

:) One of the BBC Talking Point callers used the word 'love' (aphrodite would approve) .. just caught this floating through the ether - it's not, no it can't be ... it's not _______ or is it? Looks like, but - can't be ... no USA flag in sight(s).

lunarchick - 06:52pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9223 of 9229)
lunarchick@www.com

If Bwsh has a supposed ( i'm cautious here - especially when the time in the Corps can't be validated) business background:

Then how different the magnitude of throwing a Nation into a head to head collision .. than, say ... coaching little leaguers on the Whitehouse lawn!

rshowalter - 06:53pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9224 of 9229) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

MD6013 rshowalter 6/25/01 4:05pm

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/361 is posting #307 of Paradigm Shift .... whose getting there? , a Guardian TALK thread that I'm very proud of.

A person with academic, especially dean duty experience, (Condoleezza Rice, for example) might find the following passage especially interesting.

" If "civility" means "deference to established intellectual property rights, and territorial divisions" then "civility" is the death knell of certain essential kinds of progress. Checking can be deferred, and discussion can be deferred indefinitely, especially according to the standard academic and diplomatic patterns described by John Kay in http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/highlights/essay_kay_lostcause/index.html

When it is important enough, there needs to be mechanisms to get questions of fact and logic in science (or military matters) CHECKED . When the stakes are high enough, that checking needs to be morally forcing.

The idea that checking should be morally forcing seems new, and is a distinctly minority position. But for want of that ethical stance, some really terrible choices have been made in the past, and will be made in the future.

  • ***

    Here are some references, to the Riley-Showalter "paradigm thread, that I think describe, in a new and clearer way, how paradigm conflict works.

    306-310: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/360

    313-317: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/367

    166-167: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/209

    Here are more links to the Riley-Showalter "paradigm" thread" -- of lower priority, but perhaps useful:

    26: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/33

    93-95: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/118

    215-217: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/259

    221-222: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/265

    261-262: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/310

    273-274: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/324

    and something for academic folk: 295-297: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/349

    . . . .

    On what I mean by " morally forcing ". I can swim. It seems to me that if I'm passing by a drowning kid, who I can easily save, I'm morally forced to do it.

    Others, seeing me do it, might admire me for doing my duty.

    But if they knew I walked by -- and let the kid drown -- they'd blame me. And I'd blame myself.

    I'm using "morally forcing" in that sense. for credible checking, by a process that could itself be checked.

    lunarchick - 06:58pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9225 of 9229)
    lunarchick@www.com

    Digressing here. The effect of Tragic Tuesday on the children has been mentioned by media. One comment by a child to his mother as people threw themselves off the towers was ... "Is there anybody below to catch them mommy?"

    In Bianculli, David (1994) Teleliteracy p173. Peter Jennings, on children and the gulf war, said talk to them as if they are adults - but simply.

    How do children come to terms with prolonged bombing and warfare - OUTSIDE the USA ?

    This seems to be a point rarely if ever seriously mentioned by media.

    What effect are irresponsible headlines such as Rupert Murdock - Newscorp - New York Post "WAR" .. having on little children in the US and elsewhere?

    lunarchick - 07:07pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9226 of 9229)
    lunarchick@www.com

    Business has returned to ethics.

    DOD have thoughts on it. But when push comes to shove and it's war ... are ethics and morals seen to have a place?

    More Messages Unread Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Cancel Subscriptions  Post Message
     Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense







  • Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Shopping

    News | Business | International | National | New York Region | NYT Front Page | Obituaries | Politics | Quick News | Sports | Science | Technology/Internet | Weather
    Editorial | Op-Ed

    Features | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Cartoons | Crossword | Games | Job Market | Living | Magazine | Real Estate | Travel | Week in Review

    Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

    Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company