New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(7383 previous messages)
- 07:09pm Jul 24, 2001 EST (#7384
" Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., criticized Russia
even as he stressed that the ABM Treaty should be scrapped as ``a
relic of a bygone era.''
" ``While Russia's government is still
autocratic and undemocratic, and its war on the Chechen people is
an abomination, nevertheless the world is now a long way from the
days when the Soviet Union wrapped its tentacles virtually around
the globe,'' Helms said.
" Helms insisted no one was bowled over by the
" ``We are short of Pollyannas in the Bush
administration,'' Bolton assured him, adding later, ``We're a
group of pretty hardheaded realists.''
" Many missile defense critics, including
allies, have worried that it might prompt a new arms race.
" ``The reason the Russians object to this, the
reason the Chinese are apoplectic about their 23 missiles perhaps
being completely rendered useless by a defensive system, is
because they know it alters the balance,'' Kerry said.
" ``If you change a country's perception of its
safety, ... aren't you also then inviting them to alter the
balance of power in order to secure a greater level of safety?''
" ``If their perception is inaccurate, ... it
is our task to disabuse them of their misperception,''
" Said Biden: ``The bottom line for me is: At
the end of the day, are we more or less secure?''
" The United States could violate the ABM
Treaty with any of a variety of planned steps, and Feith said a
group studying the treaty should make that determination
- 08:13pm Jul 24, 2001 EST (#7385
" I've often thought, writing on these forums,
about whether I've been keeping faith with Bill Casey -- doing
things that, on balance, he would have thought reasonable, and
right, on balance, under the circumstances. So far, weighing what
I've known and believed -- I've always judged that I have. I
believe that now.
These days, it seems to me that, if Bill Casey was looking down,
he might be smiling. For one thing, I've had a helluva time, and
knowing the old pirate, that might cheer him.
But more than that, there was an admonition, an order, that he
repeated again and again, when we met. If I had to come in, and
things were awkward in various ways, there was one thing, Casey
felt, that I had to remember. That was to "preserve
He was very definite about what he meant by "preserving
infrastructure." He meant that it was necessary to arrange actions,
messages, and pacings, so that adjustments that needed to be made
could be made, without unnecessary damage to people and
institutions, with people moving at their own pace - in ways that
worked for the human organizations, and the sunk investments, in
I was told to "come in through the TIMES," and I've tried
to do that, and done so making minimal waves -- just setting
messages out, and letting people read them, think about them, and
Has it been a waste? If only the past matters, not much but hope
has been accumulated. But some things have been hopeful.
- 08:14pm Jul 24, 2001 EST (#7386
I was glad to be able to have a one day meeting on this thread
with becq on September 25, 2000 between MD266 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:32am and MD304 rshowalt
9/25/00 5:28pm . I still think the short suggestion MD266-269 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:32am makes human and practical sense, and the offer of
9/25/00 5:28pm still stands. Did this accomplish anything? Maybe
it sowed the seeds of some ideas. Anyway, I think Casey would
have approved. He wouldn't have known of the internet channel, dying
when he did, but he would have liked it, and approved of the
usages. "Outside of channels" in some ways, but plainly
"through channels" in some others.
With Dawn Riley, there was a lot of work from September to March,
summarized in MD813-818 rshowalter
3/1/01 4:08pm . . . and I set out some motivating background in
"Science News Poetry" 3/1/01 11:58am . . . and rshowalter
"Science News Poetry" 3/1/01 2:07pm
Perhaps after some initiative on the part of the TIMES,
3/4/01 3:04pm ... there was the first of many hundreds of good
posts by the person I've taken to calling this thread's "Putin -
stand in" -- almarst . . . MD 829 almarstel2001
New York Times on the Web Forums Science