Forums

toolbar



 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?


Earliest MessagesPrevious MessagesRecent MessagesOutline (5488 previous messages)

dirac_10 - 09:47pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5489 of 5506)

almarst-2001 - 05:26pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5476 of 5488)

dirac_10 6/19/01 1:47pm

"''It's like a bullet hitting a bullet. Is it possible today or not? Today experts say that it is impossible to achieve this,'' Putin said"

Can you provide a link to the source, please?

Here you go. It's on all the wires. Might not be the exact same one.

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010619/ts/russia_us_9.html

The point being that on one hand, when convenient, he claims that it is impossible, then contradicts himself. Just like those on this forum.

He, however is logical, he is just looking for the payoff. Fine with me. I hope he gets it.

dirac_10 - 09:55pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5490 of 5506)

Analysis: Russia's Putin Hints at Missile Compromise

By Jon Boyle

MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin has dropped new hints that Russia could consider changes to a landmark arms control accord to help bridge deep differences with Washington over its plans for a missile defense shield.

In a lengthy interview late Monday with U.S. journalists on his debut summit with President Bush, Putin said a new trust was emerging between Russia and the United States which made cooperation on key arms control issues possible.

``Our partners in the United States have said and are saying now that we should think about the threats that face us all,'' he told reporters in the Kremlin library.

``People in our country have different views and opinions on this idea, but I personally share it.''

Like a breath of fresh air, is Mr Putin.

A decent man, and trustworthy friend of the United States.

possumdag - 09:55pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5491 of 5506)
Possumdag@excite.com

On home ground the activities of the 5thEstate have included using hard earned taxpayer dollars to employ goons to bully and force their opinions on others.

The 1950's hollywood hearings were a traumatic example of it terrorising citizens via Joseph McCarthy.

The violent removal of President Kennedy could be viewed as an act of an unelected arbitrator.

A case in point, on this board, where a poster is seen to continually subsume professional ethics, to the point where the only rational explanation has to be that the poster is either a puppet for the fifth estate or an escapee from the pages a 'V' rated boys comic.

possumdag - 10:04pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5492 of 5506)
Possumdag@excite.com

    Putin also said in a joking manner that Bush put up with his efforts to speak English, a language he is learning.
``I attempted to say a few words to President Bush in English,'' he said. ``He was extremely nice about it. He pretended to understand what I was talking about.''

    Interesting how Bwsh stooped to pretending to understand ... he certainly doesn't understand the report submitted to him by the USA science academy.
Putin should watch the USA Comedy "Here's Bush" ... for insights ... actually the actor is a step ahead of Bwsh being, bright, entertaining, + can dance and sing!

    possumdag - 10:10pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5493 of 5506)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    Joseph McCarthy was a sleazy bully. He ruined the careers of hundreds of innocent men and women to advance his own. Yet for all of the suffering he directly caused, not to mention the pervasive fear in liberal circles of being unfairly associated with Communism which he indirectly gave birth to, throughout his entire senatorial career, he never once was able to directly convict a single suspected Communist of a crime. ....He went from everyday senator, to national prominence, to humiliation, and to death, all in seven years.

    McCarthy played on people's fears. "The Fight For America" was nothing more than a cleverly thought-out plan that took advantage of America's hysteria about Communism during the Cold War. http://mccarthy.cjb.net/

    possumdag - 10:13pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5494 of 5506)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    Refugees say the USA was right behind this:

    possumdag - 10:18pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5495 of 5506)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    Martyr for the human rights cause - Monsignor Oscar Arnulfo Romero y Galdámez, Archbishop of San Salvador. He was assassinated while celebrating mass on 24 March 1980 in the chapel of the Divine Providence Hospital, San Salvador. He had become an outspoken critic of human rights violations and a leading human rights defender.

    In March 1980 he wrote to the then President of the United States of America (USA), Jimmy Carter, asking the USA not to provide military assistance to El Salvador which might be used to perpetrate human rights violations. He was killed shortly afterwards.

    possumdag - 10:19pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5496 of 5506)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/cemexico/intro.htm

    possumdag - 10:25pm Jun 19, 2001 EST (#5497 of 5506)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    The ARROGANCE of USA policies internationally with respect to many of their activities indicate a failure by the American people to actively participate in the Shaping of their policies.

    Are the USA people apathetic ?
    Has people power ever affected foreign policy?
    (body bags apart) wondering about 'OTHER' than own group empathy.

    More Messages Unread Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense







    Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Shopping

    News | Business | International | National | New York Region | NYT Front Page | Obituaries | Politics | Quick News | Sports | Science | Technology/Internet | Weather
    Editorial | Op-Ed

    Features | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Cartoons | Crossword | Games | Job Market | Living | Magazine | Real Estate | Travel | Week in Review

    Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

    Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company