New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?

lunarchick - 03:44pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1916 of 1927)
lunarchick@www.com

The FRENCH have suggested a European defence and peace-keeping body. Presumably to 'stop' the USA from having the 'right' to pick on a Euro State and call it 'rogue'. Wouldn't the French concept include all States that wanted to join on the European land mass?

almarst-2001 - 04:22pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1917 of 1927)

"The United States had set a March 31 deadline for Belgrade to show it was cooperating with the UN war crimes tribunal, which has indicted Milosevic, in return for releasing $US50 million ($103.41 million) in aid and supporting International Monetary Fund and World Bank programs for Belgrade. "

while I believe the Milosovic should be tried, it must be done first in Yugoslavia. The Yugoslavian court offered full cooperation with UN war crimes tribunal which could present any evidence of war crimes to the court. If they have enough of such evidence.

In my view, the American's pressure is counterproductive and can only cause the backlash by the Sebian people. Unless that exactly the intention.

almarst-2001 - 04:28pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1918 of 1927)

almarst-2001 4/2/01 4:22pm

Untill ALL facts of Balkan war are properly investigated, including the role of certain secret services arming and organising the terrorists, the motives of the diplomatic actions and the NATO leader's motives and responsibility, no justice would be seen as complete.

rshowalter - 04:38pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1919 of 1927)
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

That's surely true. But complete justice can be hard to come by.

Getting the facts of the Balkan war properly investigated, including the role of certain secret services arming and organising the terrorists, is important.

Investigating the motives of the diplomatic actions and the NATO leader's motives and responsibility, is also important.

Setting out these facts, so that they are understood, and can be evaluated on the merits, would be quite important, whether they involve trials or not.

Even so, the ideal of a War Crimes tribunal seems to me worth supporting.

almarst-2001 - 04:43pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1920 of 1927)

rshowalter 4/2/01 4:38pm

"the ideal of a War Crimes tribunal seems to me worth supporting"

Ony if seen as impartial. The current one receives the paychecks from the NATO countries and refuses even to consider the NATO investigation. No investigation of KLA was announced either.

rshowalter - 04:47pm Apr 2, 2001 EST (#1921 of 1927)
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

If outsiders from CIA or anywhere else are stirring up wars, to make money for a few corporations, or for a small clique of people -- that's a very important thing to show -- and many people will listen carefully. They won't want to believe it for a while.

But if it is true -- it is important to show -- it would surely explain a lot of things.

To show such a thing, it will be necessary to get -- closure.

A marshalling of evidence.

There aren't too many American soldiers who would want to fight for such a clique.