Conduction velocity - SK theory - with and without glia.

Conduction velocity in a transmission line is a function
of the effective R, L, G, C, and radian frequency of that line (hatted
values under S-K theory, unhatted values under K-R theory.) See
A new passive neural
equation: Part a, derivation Equation
1 below is equation (13) in this reference. Equation
13 was written in CGS units, but it has been found that units of M-K-S
are required for correct statement of the crossterms in the S-K theory.

Writing (1) out, velocity is:

For the S-K case, the relevant values are the hatted values
that include crossterms, and effective inductance is large, rather than
negligible. The hatted values are based on a notation
adapted to crossproduct terms. In this notation, the dimensional coefficients
are divided into separate real number parts (that carry **n** subscripts)
and dimensional unit groups, as follows.

For S-K theory, hatted values replace unhatted ones, and
equation (2) becomes:

In the case where G is negligible, G hat is negligible
and (6) reduces to

For small neural lines under S-K theory, the numerical
value of Lhat is much larger than Rhat. (This contrasts
with K-R theory, which corresponds to the unhatted values of R, L, G, and
C, under conditions where L, electromagnetic inductance, is negligible. )
Under S-K theory the RhatChat term is only important
at very low frequencies. As frequency increases, the
LhatChat term dominates and the velocity function gets closer
and closer to

So under S-K theory, velocity for small neural lines, with G very low, is INDEPENDENT of frequency, because frequency effects in numerator and denominator cancel.

Velocity is also substantially lower than the velocity
based on the Kelvin-Rall theory, where Lhat ~ 0 .

Let's calculate this velocity in terms of its parts, which are functions of capacitance per unit membrane area and axolemma resistivity. We'll use subscripts to show that we are dealing with the real number parts of these values (in the MKS unit system). ( Under neural conditions, L, the electromagnetic inductance, is a negligibly small part of Lhat, and is ignored below. )

In the limit where the LC term is dominant, velocity is
calculated simply.

This is a simple formula, with a numerical value that
corresponds to meters/sec. Velocity is directly proportional to line diameter,
and inversely proportional to resistivity and capacitance per membrane
area. In the case of unmyelinated neural lines without glia, the formula
yields very low predicted velocities. The following values of C_{a}
and resistivity are in commonly accepted ranges.

For an 2 micron line with these values, conduction velocity is .0002 meter/sec
(.02 cm/sec.) For low values of G, that velocity would be independent of
frequency - the same for 10 Hz or 10,000 Hz.

(Different
values of resistivity and membrane capacitance could be chosen - but all
reasonable
values would correspond to low velocitities in the glia-free, unmyelinated
neural
line case.)

The Kelvin-Rall theory predicts much higher velocities,
and velocities that vary as the square root of frequency. The
table below compares predictions of the K-R and S-K theory, for the same
2 micron low G line:

KR
velocity SK velocity KR/SK

1
Hz .042
m/sec .0002 m/sec 210 : 1

100
Hz .42
m/sec .0002 m/sec
2100 : 1

10,000 Hz
4.2 m/sec .0002 m/sec
21000 : 1

**GLIA:
The S-K theory velocities above are very low, but also apply to an artificial
case. **Neural lines in vertebrate brains
are never, or practically never, seen without a glial surround. Reasons
for that consistent glial surround have been long discussed, but remain
unclear in the literature. S-K theory offers a reason for the
glial clefts. Under S-K theory, the cleft between neural membrane and glial
membrane results is about a 100-fold reduction in effective capacitance
per unit membrane area under the dynamic conditions that apply to neurons,
and about the same 100-fold factor of reduction in energy consumption per
A.P. http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/cleft
. S-K theory conduction velocities, with glial surround,
are about 100 times higher than those shown above.

(The effect of glia under K-R theory is harder to calculate,
and much less than in S-K theory.)